{"id":719,"date":"2012-02-06T15:54:50","date_gmt":"2012-02-06T21:54:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/?p=719"},"modified":"2012-02-06T15:55:27","modified_gmt":"2012-02-06T21:55:27","slug":"economic-notes-for-the-week-of-february-6th","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dev.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/2012\/02\/economic-notes-for-the-week-of-february-6th\/","title":{"rendered":"Economic Notes for the Week of February 6th"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Personal income<\/strong> was up +0.5% for December, a bit more than expected, while spending was flat.\u00a0 The consumer savings rate increased from a fairly steady 3.5% to 4.0% for December.\u00a0 Core PCE inflation was a bit higher than forecast, resulting in a +1.8% year-over-year rate.<\/p>\n<p>The <strong>Case-Shiller home price index<\/strong> declined a seasonally-adjusted -0.7% in November, which was a bit more than expected and translated to a year-over-year decline of -3.7%.\u00a0 While several Midwest\/west cities like Phoenix and Denver saw gains, Chicago and Detroit continued to see weaker housing conditions.\u00a0 In reviewing a recent piece on housing prices across the U.S., U.K., Canada and Australia (among a few others), it was interesting to see that the American average ratio of median home price to median household income across 200 major markets stood at 3.0, which is just at the high side of the long-term average and the cheapest of the group of nations surveyed.\u00a0 Of course, the U.S. is an extremely bifurcated market, with continued extremely expensive conditions in coastal areas like California and New York, and less expensive conditions in the Midwest and South, based on these metrics.\u00a0 <!--more--><strong>Construction spending<\/strong> rose +1.5% in December, which was more than most analysts expected.\u00a0 The major gains came from \u2018private non-residential building,\u2019 although housing also rose a bit.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Consumer confidence<\/strong> declined in January from 64.5 to 61.1, which was a bit unexpected and a result of lower scores on \u2018current conditions\u2019 as opposed to \u2018expectations.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>On the business side, the <strong>Institute for Supply Management (ISM)<\/strong> <strong>manufacturing index<\/strong> rose to 54.1 for January, which was a bit higher than the revised December number.\u00a0 The new orders component gained the most in the series, and inventories contributed.\u00a0 The <strong>ISM non-manufacturing index<\/strong> jumped from 53.0 to 56.8 in January, and included gains in all aspects of the report, from business activity to new orders to employment.\u00a0 Both reports have been consistent with modest growth in economic activity.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Nonfarm productivity growth<\/strong> increased by an annualized +0.7%, quarter-over-quarter in Q4.\u00a0 Labor costs were up about a percent also.\u00a0 These aren\u2019t often a high-profile number, but trends here bear watching due to their connection to inflationary effects.\u00a0 <strong>Factory orders<\/strong> increased by +1.1% net, with better shipments but lower inventory growth.<\/p>\n<p>On the employment front, the <strong>ADP<\/strong> forecast of private employment growth showed +170,000 jobs for January, a bit below the expected +182,000 number.\u00a0 This forecast is a combination of their own proprietary database information with some publicly available government data.\u00a0 Due to some end-of-year adjustments that can look a little strange, the number is not far off the mark and is generally in line with trend.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Initial jobless claims<\/strong> for the last week in January came in at 367,000, down from the previous 379,000 and was lower than anticipated.\u00a0 These numbers, which are reported weekly, can obviously be choppy, but the more closely watched four-week moving average trend has continued to move lower, as it has for the past several months.\u00a0 Continuing claims were down 130,000 from the prior week.\u00a0 It may not \u2018feel\u2019 like it for many, but the labor market has made strides in improvement.<\/p>\n<p>The <strong>nonfarm payroll employment report<\/strong> on Friday showed an increase of 243,000 jobs, which is about 40,000 more than expected and reflects broad gains across a variety of sectors.\u00a0 Manufacturing and construction jobs were added, which previously showed less momentum.\u00a0 Additionally, the closely watched <strong>unemployment rate<\/strong> fell to 8.3%.\u00a0 From a sentiment standpoint, this is significant, as this rate is generally reported as headline news in the evening of its release.\u00a0 It is turning points like this that may cause the jobs situation to finally \u2018feel\u2019 better and result in continued positive sentiment, as sentiment is entirely based on perception of the current and future environment.<\/p>\n<p>This chart shows the 12-month change in household employment, which we think is quite instructive in showing the current trend.\u00a0 Slowly, the employment picture has indeed been improving.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/2012\/02\/economic-notes-for-the-week-of-february-6th\/2012-02-employment-chart\/\" rel=\"attachment wp-att-721\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-721\" title=\"2012-02-employment-chart\" src=\"http:\/\/www.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012-02-employment-chart.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"500\" height=\"210\" srcset=\"https:\/\/dev.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012-02-employment-chart.png 500w, https:\/\/dev.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012-02-employment-chart-300x126.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 500px) 100vw, 500px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Source:\u00a0 Payden &amp; Rygel<\/p>\n<p><strong><em>Market Notes <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<table border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"217\"><strong>Period ending 2\/3\/2012<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"123\">\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>1 Week (%)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"123\">\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>YTD (%)<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"217\">DJIA<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"123\">\n<p align=\"center\">1.62<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"123\">\n<p align=\"center\">5.46<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"217\">S&amp;P 500<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"123\">\n<p align=\"center\">2.22<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"123\">\n<p align=\"center\">7.11<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"217\">Russell 2000<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"123\">\n<p align=\"center\">4.05<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"123\">\n<p align=\"center\">12.25<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"217\">MSCI-EAFE<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"123\">\n<p align=\"center\">2.27<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"123\">\n<p align=\"center\">8.36<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"217\">MSCI-EM<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"123\">\n<p align=\"center\">3.12<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"123\">\n<p align=\"center\">14.40<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"217\">BarCap U.S. Aggregate<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"123\">\n<p align=\"center\">-0.06<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"123\">\n<p align=\"center\">0.45<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<table border=\"0\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"175\"><strong>U.S. Treasury Yields<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>3 Mo.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>2 Yr.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>5 Yr.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>10 Yr.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\"><strong>30 Yr.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"175\">12\/30\/2011<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\">0.02<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\">0.25<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\">0.83<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\">1.89<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\">2.89<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"175\">1\/27\/2012<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\">0.06<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\">0.22<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\">0.75<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\">1.93<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\">3.07<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"175\">2\/3\/2012<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\">0.08<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\">0.23<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\">0.78<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\">1.97<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" width=\"79\">\n<p align=\"center\">3.13<\/p>\n<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Risk assets led the way last week.\u00a0 U.S. stocks gained strongly in line with the positive economic data releases, lower unemployment and moderate if not spectacular company earnings due to tougher comparisons year-over-year.\u00a0 Regardless of the moderate headlines, and half of S&amp;P companies reporting, two-thirds have beaten estimates.\u00a0 Facebook filed for its initial IPO this week, although the target was lowered from $10 billion to $5 billion.<\/p>\n<p>In keeping with the strong markets, small-caps gained the most.\u00a0 Financials, telecom and technology were the best performing industries of the week, while defensive utilities, staples and health care lagged.\u00a0 Emerging markets led the foreign markets, but the EAFE also outperformed domestic markets as investors saw glimmers of hope in a Greek debt deal.<\/p>\n<p>In last week\u2019s \u2018risk-on\u2019 environment, U.S. treasury bonds lost ground and yields rose.\u00a0 Credit, such as convertibles, investment-grade corporate and bank loans, gained ground.\u00a0 Foreign debt of both the developed and emerging market variety was also up.<\/p>\n<p>Commodity contracts were largely down due to pullbacks in crude oil and natural gas, as were gold and other metals.<\/p>\n<p>Enjoy the week.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Karl Schroeder, RFC, CSA, CEP<\/p>\n<p>Investment Advisor Representative<\/p>\n<p>Schroeder Financial Services, Inc.<\/p>\n<p>480-895-0611<\/p>\n<p>Sources:\u00a0 FocusPoint Solutions, Barclays Capital, Bloomberg, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Asset Management, Morgan Stanley, MSCI, Morningstar, Northern Trust, Oppenheimer Funds, Payden &amp; Rygel, PIMCO, Reuters, Standard &amp; Poor\u2019s, U.S. Federal Reserve, Wells Capital Management, Yahoo!.\u00a0 Index performance is shown as total return, which includes dividends, with the exception of MSCI-EM, which is quoted as price return\/excluding dividends.\u00a0 Performance for the MSCI-EAFE and MSCI-EM indexes is quoted in U.S. Dollar investor terms.<\/p>\n<p>The information above has been obtained from sources considered reliable, but no representation is made as to its completeness, accuracy or timeliness.\u00a0 All information and opinions expressed are subject to change without notice.\u00a0 Information provided in this report is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, investment, legal or tax advice; and does not constitute an offer, or a solicitation of any offer, to buy or sell any security, investment or other product.\u00a0 Schroeder Financial Services, Inc. is a registered investment advisor.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Personal income was up +0.5% for December, a bit more than expected, while spending was flat.\u00a0 The consumer savings rate increased from a fairly steady 3.5% to 4.0% for December.\u00a0 Core PCE inflation was a bit higher than forecast, resulting in a +1.8% year-over-year rate. The Case-Shiller home price index declined a seasonally-adjusted -0.7% in<a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/dev.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/2012\/02\/economic-notes-for-the-week-of-february-6th\/\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-719","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-finance"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/719","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=719"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/dev.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/719\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":725,"href":"https:\/\/dev.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/719\/revisions\/725"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/dev.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/dev.sunlakesofarizona.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}